What type of violations might be considered insignificant by the NCAA?

The correct choice refers to secondary violations, which the NCAA defines as less serious infractions that do not significantly impact the integrity of the NCAA's rules and regulations. These violations typically involve minor lapses, such as an athlete receiving a small benefit that does not provide a substantial advantage or result in the violation of competitive equity.

Secondary violations are often resolved with educational measures, reminders, or corrective actions rather than severe penalties. This approach aligns with the NCAA's emphasis on promoting compliance while recognizing that not all violations warrant the same level of scrutiny or punishment. Due to their relatively minor nature, these violations are considered insignificant in the larger context of maintaining rules and promoting fair play.

In contrast, primary violations and major infractions involve more serious breaches of NCAA rules that could have significant consequences, including penalties for teams or individuals and a larger impact on the fairness of competition. Technical violations, while potentially minor, usually pertain to procedural errors rather than violations of competitive rules, differing from the context of significant infractions categorized under secondary violations.