How is "exploitation" defined in the context of NCAA student-athletes?

In the context of NCAA student-athletes, "exploitation" refers to situations where individuals or organizations take advantage of student-athletes for monetary gain without providing them with fair compensation or benefits. This definition emphasizes the ethical responsibility of institutions and individuals to treat student-athletes fairly and recognize their contributions to the athletics programs, which often generate significant revenue.

The concept of exploitation particularly highlights issues such as putting financial pressures on student-athletes or profiting from their likeness, performance, and participation while not giving them appropriate compensation or rights. This ensures that student-athletes are not just used as revenue sources but are also protected within their academic and athletic roles.

The other options do not align with the NCAA's definition of exploitation. For instance, encouraging student-athletes to quit their studies does not directly pertain to economic exploitation. Requiring excessive training relates more to physical demands and athlete welfare rather than financial issues. Benefit agreements between agents and universities may involve contracts but do not inherently indicate exploitation unless the student-athletes are not compensated fairly.